http://english.pravda.ru/science/mys...pace_probes-0/
Here are some notable paragraphs from the article:
And the best one:
So the headline of the story doesn't really reflect the conclusion of the story. Here's my question; how often do you see this kind of news reporting on the internet? If so, then why do you suppose that these writers never take the time to come up with headlines that are much more accurate to the actual story itself?
I know that Fark has a section devoted to this somewhere so don't bother pointing that out.
Here are some notable paragraphs from the article:
Quote:
"In 1949, John von Neumann developed a mathematical model of the device that was cloning itself. According to current calculations made by Nicholson and Forgan, there are three possible scenarios for such probes to operate. This includes flying with running engines, the use of gravitational acceleration and, finally, "jumping" from star to star. Even the Voyager is capable of "bouncing" from gravitational fields of the solar system." |
And the best one:
Quote:
There is no reliable information, for the time being, to prove that UFOs, or flying saucers, are vessels from other civilizations. One can only build theories, like Nicholson and Forgan do, and wait for brothers in mind, if they do exist, to show themselves to us. |
So the headline of the story doesn't really reflect the conclusion of the story. Here's my question; how often do you see this kind of news reporting on the internet? If so, then why do you suppose that these writers never take the time to come up with headlines that are much more accurate to the actual story itself?
I know that Fark has a section devoted to this somewhere so don't bother pointing that out.
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=263026&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire