To day Niels Harrit participated for two hours in an online chat. Everybody could ask questions and get an answer.
Expect for dodging a few questions, he actually made some interesting comments.
This is a resume of some of the questions and answers, many translated from Danish:
When asked about The “squibs” seen in a picture of one of the WTC towers:
His oppinion on the new Freedom tower:
Later, when he was told that New York changed the code in 2004:
When asked if 9/11 is main income:
Asked if his thermite find could generate enough heat to melt steel:
And later:
When asked if the collapses were to fast to be normal:
Asked if peer-review means that the hypotheses presented is the truth:
When asked again about the speed and the possibility of collapse due to airliner crash and fire:
When asked if he found paint in the dust or only thermite:
When asked if it is the gray or the red side that atracts by a magnet:
When asked how much thermite and how it was placed in WTC:
When asked if the chips he found would burn hot enough to melt steel:
What do you think happened at the Pentagon?
Expect for dodging a few questions, he actually made some interesting comments.
This is a resume of some of the questions and answers, many translated from Danish:
When asked about The “squibs” seen in a picture of one of the WTC towers:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit It is a clear-cut evidence of the use of explosives. |
His oppinion on the new Freedom tower:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit Actually, I do not know. But the requirements for towers in the building code has not been changed, so it must be built according to the same security requirements as the old building 7 in 1987. |
Later, when he was told that New York changed the code in 2004:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit Because it does not contain any new structural requirements for the actual construction. |
When asked if 9/11 is main income:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit Ha. It costs money to travel around and give lectures. If you have a suggestion for how you could make money on this, I would like to find out. |
Asked if his thermite find could generate enough heat to melt steel:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit There was no molten steel at Ground Zero - or at most very little. |
And later:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit No, I have never claimed that the steel melted. It was cut by thermite and explosives. |
When asked if the collapses were to fast to be normal:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit I assure you, everything which happened on Ground Zero was in agreement with the laws of nature. |
Asked if peer-review means that the hypotheses presented is the truth:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit No. There is no truth in science. Only today's best hypothesis. |
When asked again about the speed and the possibility of collapse due to airliner crash and fire:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit But the towers did not collapse due to the impact of the airliners. There is some misunderstanding here. |
When asked if he found paint in the dust or only thermite:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit There are many other red particles of dust from the WTC. But they are not attracted by a magnet. |
When asked if it is the gray or the red side that atracts by a magnet:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit We do not know. The gray side is an iron oxide. This is probably superparamagnetism. |
When asked how much thermite and how it was placed in WTC:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit I do not know. But a lot. In terms of access to the towers, as applied to the well to be good friends with the concierge. |
When asked if the chips he found would burn hot enough to melt steel:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit It cannot be answered when you only react one chip at a time. |
What do you think happened at the Pentagon?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niels Harrit There was no Boeing 757 at the Pentagon. |
via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/1hZPXGU
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire