I don't know if anyone else noticed this or not, but we are now entering the second quarter of 2014, and it was not merely one of the coldest, harshest, snowiest Winters around; but also one the coldest "Springs" we have ever had in a while! How can we be so sure that the true global trajectory of Climate Change is really increasing warmth, when there is sooo much variance in natural temperatures, that we can still have extended Winters instead of "Springs"?
I know the IPCC recently released another one of their reports about the dangers of climate change, because it is their job to do so, every few years. But, the first thing some folks do, when confronted with serious dangers on anything, is to turn to the economists about the dangers people actually put thought into! For example, Nate Silver's blog recently ran a story that shows how storm data an be made to look like they are not getting any worse, once you remove the most scare-mongering data coming from the scientists. And, other articles compared the IPCC report to the NIPPC report, and found contradictory statements between long term and short impacts in each one!
Besides, the IPCC also that came up with the Kyoto protocol, and that didn't seem to solve the "problem" they though they had, anyway. That was more like some sort of preliminary effort, at best.
But, let's make another point, for just a moment. Let us assume Global Warming DOES happen, anyway. (For the sake of argument.) There certainly is enough evidence that climate change won't actually do what the most ardent, and ill-informed pro-global-warming activists claim it will! All of the following are the TRUE consequences of global warming:
* Increased precipitation will actually create more ice in the Antarctic. Not melt all of it away.
* More farmland will be available to folks at higher altitudes.
* Fewer illnesses will be caused by cold temperatures
* Worried about extinction? Well, it happens that most species, making up the majority of living biomass, will actually thrive in the warmth!
* More trees will replace ice, absorbing more carbon, anyway. Not putting any more back into the air!
* Right now, fresh water is a problem for many parts of the world. Warming would increase the supply!
* Scientists will find more neat fossils and things, out of the melting permafrost. They already are doing so!
* More jelly fish will be available to display in awesome-looking jelly fish aquariums!
Now, getting back to my main point:
"What about the science?", you ask. Well, when I examined most of the science for myself, I found a LOT of it, especially the foundational early work, to be based on lots of proxies for data. We all know that science without proxies is better than science with them. So, those activists that took all the proxies away found cause to deny global warming. Therefore: Their science must be better!
It is also very clear that the International media is catching on to the true nature of climate, as well. Disney, a normally liberal company, had a hit movie with Frozen, (staring Veronica of Mars and Adele Dazeem). If they really thought global warming was such a concern, why would they have a snowman character yearning to bask in the summer sun? What kind of a lesson is that, for today's environmentally conscious youth? I suspect Disney knows the truth: That the concept of global warming is not entirely accurate. But, they don't want to say that publically, because it would be considered taboo. Instead, they present their knowledge in more subtle, subversive ways!
I am not really a climate change denier. I know climate changes. If it didn't, then everywhere would just be hot lava. But, as this article demonstrates: Global warming can also be a sad joke!
I know the IPCC recently released another one of their reports about the dangers of climate change, because it is their job to do so, every few years. But, the first thing some folks do, when confronted with serious dangers on anything, is to turn to the economists about the dangers people actually put thought into! For example, Nate Silver's blog recently ran a story that shows how storm data an be made to look like they are not getting any worse, once you remove the most scare-mongering data coming from the scientists. And, other articles compared the IPCC report to the NIPPC report, and found contradictory statements between long term and short impacts in each one!
Besides, the IPCC also that came up with the Kyoto protocol, and that didn't seem to solve the "problem" they though they had, anyway. That was more like some sort of preliminary effort, at best.
But, let's make another point, for just a moment. Let us assume Global Warming DOES happen, anyway. (For the sake of argument.) There certainly is enough evidence that climate change won't actually do what the most ardent, and ill-informed pro-global-warming activists claim it will! All of the following are the TRUE consequences of global warming:
* Increased precipitation will actually create more ice in the Antarctic. Not melt all of it away.
* More farmland will be available to folks at higher altitudes.
* Fewer illnesses will be caused by cold temperatures
* Worried about extinction? Well, it happens that most species, making up the majority of living biomass, will actually thrive in the warmth!
* More trees will replace ice, absorbing more carbon, anyway. Not putting any more back into the air!
* Right now, fresh water is a problem for many parts of the world. Warming would increase the supply!
* Scientists will find more neat fossils and things, out of the melting permafrost. They already are doing so!
* More jelly fish will be available to display in awesome-looking jelly fish aquariums!
Now, getting back to my main point:
"What about the science?", you ask. Well, when I examined most of the science for myself, I found a LOT of it, especially the foundational early work, to be based on lots of proxies for data. We all know that science without proxies is better than science with them. So, those activists that took all the proxies away found cause to deny global warming. Therefore: Their science must be better!
It is also very clear that the International media is catching on to the true nature of climate, as well. Disney, a normally liberal company, had a hit movie with Frozen, (staring Veronica of Mars and Adele Dazeem). If they really thought global warming was such a concern, why would they have a snowman character yearning to bask in the summer sun? What kind of a lesson is that, for today's environmentally conscious youth? I suspect Disney knows the truth: That the concept of global warming is not entirely accurate. But, they don't want to say that publically, because it would be considered taboo. Instead, they present their knowledge in more subtle, subversive ways!
I am not really a climate change denier. I know climate changes. If it didn't, then everywhere would just be hot lava. But, as this article demonstrates: Global warming can also be a sad joke!
via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/1hXnI5X
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire