Expert Help Please

On another forum I frequent a poster put this tidbit together:

Quote:

A theory tries to encapsulate reality within the framework of mathematics, a theory is not reality but an approximation of reality under certain conditions and restrictions, there will be theories which will displace general relativity in the future. Relativity is obviously incorrect in describing the entirety of the universe and it says nothing about the strong,weak, and electromagnetic force's relation to space time. The cosmic background radiation, we claim to have a picture of the universe when it was just an infant. Photons move at the speed of light, if the universe expanded at less than the speed of light those photons would have been long gone. If the universe expanded at the speed of light, those photons would be dangling at the edge of the universe and we would not be able to capture them into a photograph. It is only when the universe does not respect the speed of light, and expands many fold faster than the speed of light does taking a photo of our baby universe be possible.

I'm just not knowledgeable to dissect this and put the errors in laymans terms.



Could someone please tell me what's wrong with this? I know the theory definition isn't correct and I'm sure this is a product of the alimentary canal but I simply don't know why.



Thanks



ETA: Forgot to mention he says FTL speeds have been exceeded by a factor of a million or so. I disagreed. We were talking initially about ftl radio or TV at the time and how an alien race couldn't communicate from outside the solar system because of the SOL limitation.

via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/VZzs3S