Well I can simplify things very easily for the crowd so that there is no confusion.
I have made discovery of stellar evolution/planet formation which differs greatly than establishment science AND electric universe.
I can break all three down very easily:
1. Establishment science has planets formed as left overs from stars' formation
2. Electric universe has planets being ejected from stars.
3. Stellar metamorphosis (this theory) has stars cooling and dying becoming the old star (planet)
If you shall notice both electric universe and establishment science are under the same interpretation, stars and planets are mutually exclusive. Stellar metamorphosis is different than both. I hold that when a star dies, it loses mass to solar radiation, solar flares and solar wind over many billions of years, eventually forming a little ball of matter in its center called a "planet", as it cools and dies.
To recap:
1. Establishment science: stars are not planets
2. Electric universe: stars are not planets
3. Stellar metamorphosis: stars are new planets, and planets are evolving/old/dead stars
I have outlined a great majority of the conclusions of this discovery on vixra.org, as I do not have major connections inside of universities, nor do I have the money to publish vast amounts of material to be edited by outside entities.
All I have is a simple understanding which contradicts both establishment science and electric universe (which hold the same assumption). This discovery flatly denies that stars are fusion reactors and planets inert balls of gas and rocks. It states clearly that the "star" cools and dies becoming the "planet". This means that the majority of star science needs to be corrected immediately.
Google: stellar metamorphosis
I have made a great majority of ideas which contradict establishment available on vixra.org.
I have made discovery of stellar evolution/planet formation which differs greatly than establishment science AND electric universe.
I can break all three down very easily:
1. Establishment science has planets formed as left overs from stars' formation
2. Electric universe has planets being ejected from stars.
3. Stellar metamorphosis (this theory) has stars cooling and dying becoming the old star (planet)
If you shall notice both electric universe and establishment science are under the same interpretation, stars and planets are mutually exclusive. Stellar metamorphosis is different than both. I hold that when a star dies, it loses mass to solar radiation, solar flares and solar wind over many billions of years, eventually forming a little ball of matter in its center called a "planet", as it cools and dies.
To recap:
1. Establishment science: stars are not planets
2. Electric universe: stars are not planets
3. Stellar metamorphosis: stars are new planets, and planets are evolving/old/dead stars
I have outlined a great majority of the conclusions of this discovery on vixra.org, as I do not have major connections inside of universities, nor do I have the money to publish vast amounts of material to be edited by outside entities.
All I have is a simple understanding which contradicts both establishment science and electric universe (which hold the same assumption). This discovery flatly denies that stars are fusion reactors and planets inert balls of gas and rocks. It states clearly that the "star" cools and dies becoming the "planet". This means that the majority of star science needs to be corrected immediately.
Google: stellar metamorphosis
I have made a great majority of ideas which contradict establishment available on vixra.org.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1x88aYw
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire