Polygamy Anyone??

The thing I can't figure out is why anyone in favor of same sex marriage, based on the fact that two consenting adults in a same sex union deserve the same "rights' as a male/female couple, would be against polygamous relationships?

The argument doesn't make sense. What makes sense is this ruling and the gay rights activist aren't really interested in rights but pushing their own agenda on everyone else.

This was never about rights if it was about rights we would give everyone the same benefits and we do not. The same people in favor of gay marriage are for some strange reason opposed to polygamy or whatever comes next.

It will be hard for this court to rule against new forms of unions people will come up with.

This is what I call liberal fascism

http://ift.tt/1CA2iqz

Quote:

Welcome to the exciting new world of the slippery slope. With the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling this Friday legalizing same sex marriage in all 50 states, social liberalism has achieved one of its central goals. A right seemingly unthinkable two decades ago has now been broadly applied to a whole new class of citizens. Following on the rejection of interracial marriage bans in the 20th Century, the Supreme Court decision clearly shows that marriage should be a broadly applicable right—one that forces the government to recognize, as Friday’s decision said, a private couple’s “love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family.” The question presents itself: Where does the next advance come? The answer is going to make nearly everyone uncomfortable: Now that we’ve defined that love and devotion and family isn’t driven by gender alone, why should it be limited to just two individuals? The most natural advance next for marriage lies in legalized polygamy—yet many of the same people who pressed for marriage equality for gay couples oppose it.

via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1TTJ4qW