When one examines writings of antiquity it is quickly and easily realised that the entire Pauline Corpus is a compilation of very late writings which were unknown up to 175-180 CE or at least after "True Discourse" attributed to Celsus as found in "Origen's "Against Celsus".
The very first problem with the Pauline Corpus is that the supposed author called Paul is unknown by all contemporary non-apologetic writings.
In the Pauline Corpus it is claimed Paul was a Pharisee, a Hebrew of Hebrews of the tribe of Benjamin.
The Dead Sea Scrolls do not mention any character called Paul or any Pauline sect called Christians and there are no arguments for or against the Pauline Gospel.
Dead Sea Scrolls have been dated up to the 1st century.
The supposed non-apologetic contemporaries Philo, Josephus, Pliny the Elder, Tacitus, Suetonius and Pliny the younger have nothing at all about Paul the Hebrew of Hebrews, the alleged founder of Christian Churches outside Judea.
Based of the abundance of evidence from antiquity the Pauline character and Corpus are LATE inventions.
The very first problem with the Pauline Corpus is that the supposed author called Paul is unknown by all contemporary non-apologetic writings.
In the Pauline Corpus it is claimed Paul was a Pharisee, a Hebrew of Hebrews of the tribe of Benjamin.
The Dead Sea Scrolls do not mention any character called Paul or any Pauline sect called Christians and there are no arguments for or against the Pauline Gospel.
Dead Sea Scrolls have been dated up to the 1st century.
The supposed non-apologetic contemporaries Philo, Josephus, Pliny the Elder, Tacitus, Suetonius and Pliny the younger have nothing at all about Paul the Hebrew of Hebrews, the alleged founder of Christian Churches outside Judea.
Based of the abundance of evidence from antiquity the Pauline character and Corpus are LATE inventions.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1hEmxA1
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire